RTI applicant admonished for filing identical pleas in Punjab
Taking cognisance of the blatant misuse of provisions of the Right to Information Act 2005, the Punjab State Information Commission has admonished an RTI applicant Naresh K. Gupta for his act and conduct of filing verbatim identical RTI applications before the same public authorities.
IANS
Jul 25, 2022 09:18
0
Chandigarh, July 25 (IANS) Taking cognisance of the blatant misuse of provisions of the Right to Information Act 2005, the Punjab State Information Commission has admonished an RTI applicant Naresh K. Gupta for his act and conduct of filing verbatim identical RTI applications before the same public authorities.
The matter came to the fore when a bunch of 13 applications of second appeal filed by him were listed before the Bench of Maninder Singh Patti.
At the time of hearing, the respondent-public information officer (PIO) drew attention towards two such specific appeal cases pending before the coordinate Bench of the commission, where the appellant had filed identical RTI application, which was verbatim similar to those filed in the appeal cases. The cases were being adjudicated before the Bench of Patti, who upon calling for the records of the pending cases and compared them with the case before him and came to a conclusion that the stand of the respondent was correct.
Upon taking serious note of the fact, the Information Commissioner held that the Act "not only amounts to abuse of process of law but also lines up in stark violation of the statement of objects and reasons with which the Right to Information Act was enacted".
It was further observed that such tactics being adopted by the RTI activists need to be deprecated and it has to be ensured that the provisions of beneficial legislation like the RTI Act are not misused by individuals to harass the government officials.
The commission also noted that appellant Gupta had filed 12 out of 13 applications under the 'life and liberty' clause whereas in neither of his application he had spelled out any reason which would show any element of imminent danger to life and liberty justifying the filing of said applications under alife and liberty' clause.
The commission held that the act of filing the applications under the 'life and liberty' clause was not justified by any extent and was a mere tool to pressurise the officials.
